Legal Opinion

Tuttle v. Everhot Heater Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933No. Docket No. 120, Calendar No. 36,844PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. McDonald, C. J.

Harris B. Tuttle and Olive Tuttle are husband and wife. At the time the cause of action arose they were residing in Rochester, New York, in a home the title to which they held by the entireties. Their household goods were owned jointly. An automatic gas heater manufactured and sold by the defendants was installed in their home. Early one morning the heater exploded, damaging the building and furniture and seriously injuring Mrs. Tuttle. On the theory that the heater was negligently constructed and functioned improperly, they brought three suits in the Wayne county circuit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reilly v. . Sicilian Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Matter of Goodrich v. . Vil. of OtegoNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Mastrofrancisco v. Mohawk Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Henderson v. United States Radiator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. Rinaldi v. RinaldiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Clements v. ConstantineMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wood Et Ux v. Baker Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Quackenbush v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API