Clements v. Constantine
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This is an action at law for a broker’s
commission. The controversy arose in this way: On July 13, 1950, Irma S. Constantine and her husband, Peter Constantine, entered into a written agreement with plaintiff’s decedent. In it they granted plaintiff’s decedent, or his assigns, an option to purchase certain real estate located in the city of Detroit. The agreement, written upon a Detroit real-estate board “Option Form,” provided for the purchase of the described property for the sum of $125,000, upon condition that there be an acceptance of the option in writing on or before the expiration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Marsh v. . MastertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Dutton v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Le Roy v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Tuttle v. Everhot Heater Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dacon v. TransueMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Rogers v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Ward v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Eyde v. Meridian Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Halverson v. HagemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.