McCuistion v. City of Siloam Springs
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Appellants financed and constructed a sewer line in Siloam Springs which they claim was pursuant to a contract whereby appellee city agreed to collect charges from individuals and businesses tying onto the line and remit those charged to appellants for fifteen years as reimbursement for appellants’ construction of the line. At the end of the fifteen year period, title to the line would vest in the city. When the city failed to remit these charges, appellants filed suit against it for breach of contract seeking judgment for all fees or charges collected from third parties…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Spink v. MourtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Frick v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Smith v. DandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Gladson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Revis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Johnson Regional Medical Cntr. v. Dr. Robert HaltermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Harold McLaughlin Reliable Truck Brokers, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Grendell v. KiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Dedman v. PorchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. v. FrantzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.