Legal Opinion

Gladson v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 1938No. 4-5201PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smith, C. J.

Appellees are citizens and taxpayers of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. They brought this suit to restrain the appellant from serving as superintendent of the Fayetteville water plant; to-restrain payment of $200 per month .as salary to appellant, and to recover $4,400 salary paid.

On final hearing the injunctive relief was granted, but the court declined to give judgment for salary collected. There was an appeal and cross-appeal.

Acting under authority of § 7366 of Pope’s Digest, the City of Fayetteville, in September, 1925, enacted an ordinance by which it assumed full management of- the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faucette v. GerlachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Fitzgerald v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Tallman v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Frick v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  5. City of Little Rock v. the White Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cosgrove v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. McCuistion v. City of Siloam SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Adams v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. City of Damascus v. BivensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Paragould Cablevision, Inc. v. City of ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API