Legal Opinion

Grendell v. Kiehl

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 16, 1987No. 86-129PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Don Grendell brings this appeal from a judgment of $11,329.60 rendered against him by the circuit court. Appellees Ferdinand and Loretta Kiehl brought an action for deceit against Grendell alleging misrepresentation and seeking judgment for compensatory and punitive damages. Grendell argues three points of error on appeal: the circuit judge erred in not directing a verdict at the close of the plaintiffs case; the judgment was not supported by the law and the evidence, and the amount of the judgment is not supported by the evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ray Dodge, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Lane v. RachelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. McCuistion v. City of Siloam SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Storthz v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Sellers v. West-Ark Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. City of Caddo Valley v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. AlterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Wallis v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Delta School of Commerce, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Arkansas Kraft v. CottrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API