Legal Opinion

Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. v. Frantz

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 23, 1992No. 92-133PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Three points are raised by this appeal: whether a distributorship agreement between appellant Dr. Pepper Co. of Paragould, Inc. (Dr. Pepper) and appellee Don Frantz (Frantz) is subject to the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act; whether Dr. Pepper’s termination of the distributorship was without good cause and in violation of statutory provisions; and whether the evidence supports damages of $100,000 awarded to Frantz. Answering those questions in the affirmative, we affirm.

On November 17,1986, Frantz and Dr. Pepper entered into a contract entitled “Distributorship…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. MarinelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Bush v. National School Studios, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Jim Halsey Co., Inc. v. BonarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Duvall v. Massachusetts Indemnity & Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. McCuistion v. City of Siloam SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Harold McLaughlin Reliable Truck Brokers, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Bank of America, N.A. v. C.D. Smith Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. State v. Diamond Lakes Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Rathbun v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. South Beach Beverage Co. v. Harris Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API