Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. v. Frantz
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
Three points are raised by this appeal: whether a distributorship agreement between appellant Dr. Pepper Co. of Paragould, Inc. (Dr. Pepper) and appellee Don Frantz (Frantz) is subject to the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act; whether Dr. Pepper’s termination of the distributorship was without good cause and in violation of statutory provisions; and whether the evidence supports damages of $100,000 awarded to Frantz. Answering those questions in the affirmative, we affirm.
On November 17,1986, Frantz and Dr. Pepper entered into a contract entitled “Distributorship…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shell Oil Co. v. MarinelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Bush v. National School Studios, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Jim Halsey Co., Inc. v. BonarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Duvall v. Massachusetts Indemnity & Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- McCuistion v. City of Siloam SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Harold McLaughlin Reliable Truck Brokers, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Bank of America, N.A. v. C.D. Smith Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- State v. Diamond Lakes Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Rathbun v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- South Beach Beverage Co. v. Harris Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.