Handy v. Holland Furnace Co.

After identification of the parties, it is alleged in the amended complaint:

“3. That during the month of September, 1958, agents of the defendant approached the plaintiffs and recommended and sold to the plaintiffs a thermostatic fan system for their furnace.

“4. That the plaintiffs, in accepting and purchasing said thermostatic fan system, relied on the judgment of the employees and agents of the defendant, Holland Furnace Company.

“5. That on several occasions, the plaintiffs called the defendant and requested that they come out and fix said thermostatic fan system as it was not operating…