MacK v. Hugh W. Comstock Associates, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered on an order sustaining the defendants’ demurrers to their amended complaint and granting a motion to strike after plaintiffs had declined an opportunity to amend. The chief questions on appeal concern the proper measure of consequential damages recoverable in an action for breach of warranty and the statute of limitations.
The facts alleged by the second amended complaint are as follows: The plaintiffs, George and Gladys Mack, husband and wife, entered into a written contract in August 1954 with the defendant, Hugh W. Comstock…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Gherna v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.