Philipsky v. Scheflow & Monahan

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages from the defendants for injuries sustained by him as the result of the negligent operation of an automobile by the defendant Zar-ling. The defendant copartnership, doing business under the name of “Scheflow & Monahan,” and sued herein only by attempted service on it as an entity under that name, demurred to the complaint on the ground that “it fails to state *315facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against said partnership.”

The allegations in the complaint which are involved ih passing upon that demurrer are that the plaintiff was 'an employee of E.…