Legal Opinion
Elliott Associates, LP v. the Republic of Peru
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 28, 1997No. 96 Civ. 7917(RWS), 96 Civ. 7916(RWS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Elliott Associates, L.P. (“Elliott”) has moved for summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. against the defendants the Republic of Peru (“Peru”) and Banco de la Nacion (“Banco”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied at this time.
Prior Proceedings
Elliott commenced these actions on October 18, 1996, to recover on certain agreements, the actions were removed to this Court, Elliott’s motion for an attachment was denied as an exercise of discretion on December 12, 1996, and Elliott’s instant motion for summary judgment was heard and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Keywell Corporation v. Daniel C. Weinstein and Anthony BoscarinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Murrell v. Ocean Mecca Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Toussie v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Four Star Capital Corp. v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Elliott Associates, L.P. v. Republic of PeruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Strougo on Behalf of Brazil Fund, Inc. v. PadegsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.