Legal Opinion
Viso v. Gullo
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 29, 1934No. 32572PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OVERTON, Justice.
Sam Gullo and Joe Viso conducted for a number of years a grocery store under the name of Sam Gullo & Co. When times were good the 'business prospered fairly well, but when prosperity ceased, the firm became involved, and was unable to meet its liabilities as they matured. As a result it became necessary to liquidate the partnership. Thereafter Viso continued to operate the business for himself on property owned by the individual members of the firm.
According to the allegations of the petition, at some time prior to May 28, 1932, Gullo proposed to Viso that, in order to place…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stanton v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Campbell v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Cannon v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Nichols v. OppermannWashington Supreme Court · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wampler v. WamplerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Montz v. TheardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Hardie v. AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Robinson v. MarksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Segari v. UchelloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.