Legal Opinion
American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. New York Rys. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 21, 1922No. Nos, 246, 247PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It thus appears that the Eighth Avenue and Ninth Avenue Railroad Companies in the city of New York leased their lines of street railroad to the Metropolitan Street Railway, which thus came into the hands of the New York Railways Company as its successor. The terms of the leases not having been complied with a demand was made upon the receiver of the Metropolitan Company for a return of their lines of road. That demand has been complied with, under the orders of the District Court. But that court denies the claim which the lessors have made to an immediate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Odell v. H. Batterman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Green v. ObergfellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- West v. Radio-Keith-Orpheum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Rector v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.