Leal v. Allstate Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Estevan and Denise Leal (the “Leals”), third parties who were injured by the negligence of Allstate Insurance Company’s (“Allstate”) insured, appeal from the dismissal of their claims against Allstate for breach of an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. The Leals allege that Allstate voluntarily assumed such a duty in adjusting their claims against its insured by pledging that it would consider the Leals to be customers entitled to “quality customer service.” Alternatively, the Leals argue that Allstate’s duty to them is implied by Arizona’s mandatory…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Scroggins v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Manterola v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Ballesteros v. AMERICAN STANDARD INS. CO. OF WISC.District Court, D. Arizona · 2006
- Hayden Business Center Condominiums Ass'n v. Pegasus Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Smith v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.