Legal Opinion

Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1991No. CV-90-0292-PRPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

Ticor Title Insurance Company of California (Ticor) petitioned us to review a court of appeals’ opinion, claiming that the court had improperly expanded the duties and obligations of an escrow agent, creating obligations not previously imposed by law. See Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., 165 Ariz. 299, 798 P.2d 1308 (Ct.App.1989). Because the facts raised important legal questions concerning the obligations of es crow agents doing business in this state, we granted review on all issues. See Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. Having permitted briefing by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Broemmer v. Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lockerby v. SierraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. McAlister v. CitibankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API