Roach v. Caraffa
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
Domenico Caraffa and Giovanni B. Caraffa, brothers, entered into business as partners, in San Francisco, in the year 1859. Shortly afterwards they sold a one-third interest in their business to one Raggio, and admitted him into the partnership, the business being continued, as before, in the firm name of D. Caraffa & Co. In October, 1865, Domenico, being in failing health, returned to Italy, where he continued to remain until his death, which occurred in November, 1874. It is .claimed on the part of the plaintiff, who is administrator of the estate of Domenico, that when he, Domenico, went to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- In re AllgierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Ord v. De La GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Anderson v. NorthropSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- In re Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.