Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wilson v. Shear Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1926No. 302Published

1Concurrence

GALLAGHER, 0. J., and BARCUS, J.

(concurring). We concur in the disposition of this case made by our associate, Mr. Justice STANFORD. We do not think that appellant Mrs. Wilson was entitled to judgment in her favor on the verdict rendered, nor do we think that the Shear Company was entitled to judgment in its favor on such verdict. We do not wish, however, to be considered as concurring in all the findings of fact made in the course of said opinion, nor in all the conclusions of law therein expressed. Our concurrence is limited to matters essential to the proper disposition of this appeal, and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. Union National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Morris v. Georgia Loan, Savings & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Green v. PriddyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hunter v. EasthamTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Geyser-Marion Gold-Min. Co. v. StarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API