Legal Opinion

Dye v. Schick

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1920No. 10,712PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Boone Circuit Court; Willett H. Parr, Judge. Condemnation proceedings by a railroad company and payment of award into court. Adverse petitions by William F. Schick and Malora Dye as to distribution of the award. From the judgment rendered, the latter appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Appellee Schick, on July 15, 1916, purchased a tract of land from appellant, and a written contract was entered into, acknowledged and recorded, by the terms of which said appellee became the owner of the land, appellant holding the legal title as security for the payment of the purchase money. Appellee paid $300 cash, and agreed' to pay $25 per month with interest after maturity, until the full purchase price of $4,200 *460was paid, with privilege of paying more than $25 per month and to pay the full amount at any time. Appellee took possession of the land, and in all respects performed the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consumers' Gas Trust Co. v. HarlessIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gimbel v. StolteIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Sherwood v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Meyer v. State ex rel. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Greenman v. PattisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Noble v. TweedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Eden United, Inc. v. ShortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Jelco, Incorporated v. Third Judicial District CourtUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hampel v. GleasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Board of Education, Rio Rancho Public School District v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API