Legal Opinion

Gimbel v. Stolte

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

— This was au action by the appellee, Mina Btolte, as administratrix of the estate of Frederick Jasper, deceased, against Michael Gimbel, the city of Indianapolis and Frederick Wuusch.

Judgment was rendered in favor of Indianapolis, on ■demurrer to the complaint, and, on trial and finding by the court in favor of the plaintiff, against Gimbel, for the sum of one hundred and twenty-six dollars and twenty-five cents.

The following are the material facts developed upon ■the trial of the cause:

Jasper, the plaintiff’s intestate, held a judgment .against Wunsch, which was a lien on a lot in the city…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Astor v. HoytCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  2. In re JohnNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Watson v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Astor v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  5. Enfield Toll Bridge Co v. Hartford & New-Haven Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. O'Neal Steel, Inc. v. MilletteMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hervey v. KrostIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Elston v. CastorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Foltz, Van Camp Hdw., Etc. v. City of Indpls.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Shirk v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API