Legal Opinion

Hampel v. Gleason

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1975No. 45014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Hennepin County District Court declaring that a condemnation award is subject to the legal security interest of the vendors under a contract for deed and to the equitable interest of the vendees. The court concluded that the condemnation award should be deposited in a trust or savings deposit under court supervision to protect the vendors’ lien from disposal of the proceeds by the vendees. The contract vendees, Wolf and Phyllis Hampel, appeal from this order. We affirm.

The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Minneapolis condemned a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Summers v. Midland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Dye v. SchickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Matter of City of ShakopeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. In re HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API