Legal Opinion

Scalia v. Erie Insurance Exchange

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 2005PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 The issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees to defendant-appellee, following a trial in which the jury found that appellee had not breached its insurance contract with plaintiffs-appellants. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.

¶ 2 The residence of appellants Richard and Serena Sealia (“the Scalias”) suffered extensive damage in a fire on July 1, 1998. The Scalias had insured their home with appellee Erie Insurance Exchange (“Erie”), under a policy that covered loss of the structure and personal property on a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Lucchino v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Township of South Strabane v. PiecknickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Miller v. NelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ace American Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyds & CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In Re PadezaninSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. True Railroad Associates, L.P. v. Ames True Temper, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Estate of: Simpson, W.Appeal of: Colecchia, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Estate of: Simpson, W.Appeal of: Colecchia, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API