Legal Opinion
Lucchino v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 23, 2002No. 96-114-RPublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
George M. Lucchino (Lucchino) appeals from a Commonwealth Court decision affirming an Order of the Environmental Hearing Board (EHB) directing him to pay costs and counsel fees to a permittee, Luzerne Land Corporation (Luzerne), in the amount of $6,987.50, pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Surface Mining Conservation and Reclamation Act *280(SMCRA),1 and Section 307(b) of The Clean Streams Law (CSL).2 We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In May of 1996, the EHB, acting under the authorization of the SMCRA and the CSL, approved an application submitted by Luzerne for a permit…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Krenzelak v. KrenzelakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Petrovick v. COM., DEPT OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- McMullen v. KutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- James Corp. v. North Allegheny School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.