Chong v. Fremont Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, J.
In this appeal we conclude that Public Utilities Code section 3631, which requires regulated highway carriers to provide liability protection, does not require vehicle liability policies to cover work-related injuries sustained by the vehicle owner’s employees.
Vernon Chong (hereafter appellant) appeals a summary judgment holding that Fremont Indemnity Company (hereafter respondent), as liability insurer of appellant’s employer’s truck, had no duty to provide coverage to the employer for bodily injuries sustained by appellant in a work-related accident. Appellant contends the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Samson v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Argonaut Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Sand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Ellis v. Roshei Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aerojet-General Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Rymer v. HaglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Fundamental Investment Growth Shelter Realty Fund v. GradowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Tad Imuta v. Takaaki NakanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Evans v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.