Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Borigini

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 9, 2013No. Misc. No. 2013-0021PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Denying Motion to Enforce and Compel Non-Party Subpoena

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action arises from the plaintiffs motion to enforce a non-party subpoena and compel production against Dr. Mark Borigini. The subpoena was issued and served in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion to enforce the non-party subpoena is denied and the case is dismissed.

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Mark Gordon, who suffers from Lupus, brought suit against Federal Express Corporation and Aetna Life…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Watts v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. DL v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. United States v. Star Scientific, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et AlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Phillips & Cohen, LLP v. ThorpeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Manteca Lifestyle Center, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API