Gordon v. Borigini
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Motion to Enforce and Compel Non-Party Subpoena
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This action arises from the plaintiffs motion to enforce a non-party subpoena and compel production against Dr. Mark Borigini. The subpoena was issued and served in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion to enforce the non-party subpoena is denied and the case is dismissed.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Mark Gordon, who suffers from Lupus, brought suit against Federal Express Corporation and Aetna Life…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Watts v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- DL v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. Star Scientific, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et AlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Phillips & Cohen, LLP v. ThorpeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Manteca Lifestyle Center, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024