Vulcraft, Inc. v. Wilbanks

HOLMES, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

Appellant argues that the trial court erred to reversal in that there were no findings of fact and/or proof as to the number of weeks appellee-employee worked for appellant and, hence, insufficient proof of employee’s average weekly wage or period of employment. Additionally, appellant-employer argues that the trial court erred in finding the employee permanently and totally disabled and making an appropriate award.

We find no merit in either contention.

The employer, in his answer, admitted that the employee’s average weekly pay was $137.50.…