Legal Opinion

Federal Mogul Corp. v. Moses

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 29, 1976No. Civ. 930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case. From a judgment in favor of the employee the employer appeals.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court's finding that the employee sustained a 30% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole with a corresponding 30% loss of earning ability is supported by the evidence. We find that it is and affirm.

The pertinent facts are as follows:

The employee is a high school graduate, having completed his high school education while serving in the U.S. Army. He is thirty-two years old and the father of three children. After discharge from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. BF Goodrich Company v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. BF Goodrich Company v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. Vulcraft, Inc. v. WilbanksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waters Bros. Contractors, Inc. v. WimberleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. CorfmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Turner v. DRUMMOND COMPANY, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Marion Homes of Bear Creek v. DulaneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API