Rose v. Steen Cleaning, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Plaintiff brings forth only one assignment of error for our review, contending that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we agree and reverse. This Court, as well as our Supreme Court, has repeatedly stated that summary judgment is not a preferable manner in which to dispose of negligence cases. As a general proposition, issues arising in negligence cases are ordinarily not susceptible to summary adjudication because application of the prudent person test, or any other applicable standard of care, is generally…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Taylor v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Hedrick Ex Rel. Hedrick v. TigniereSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Jordan v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Little v. MatthewsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Estate of Hendrickson Ex Rel. Hendrickson v. Genesis Health Venture, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Dunleavy v. Yates Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Sheppard v. Zep Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Little v. MatthewsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.