Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1985No. 391PA84PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

The sole question before the Court in this case is whether there exists any genuine issue of material fact concerning the DOT’s alleged negligence to be submitted to a jury. We hold that defendants’ forecast of the evidence raised genuine issues of material fact and that it was improper for the trial court to grant the DOT’s motion for summary judgment.

To make out a case of actionable negligence the plaintiff must introduce evidence tending to show that (1) defendant failed to exercise proper care in the performance of a duty owed to plaintiff; (2) the negligent breach of that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Pittman v. FrostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Baumann v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stone v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Norman v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Sheppard v. Zep Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Talian v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Rose v. Steen Cleaning, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API