Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. Zep Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1994No. 9330SC227PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendants bring forward three assignments of error. After a careful review of the record, transcript and briefs, we find no error.

I

In their first two assignments of error, defendants argue that: 1) they are entitled to a directed verdict because “defendants cannot be held liable for the employer’s [Champion’s] negligence in failing to warn its [Champion’s] employees of a dangerous condition which it created,” and; 2) the “trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that if the defendants were fully assured that because of the location of the demonstration no warnings were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. West v. King's Department Store, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. B. B. Walker Co. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Jordan v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Talian v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beam v. KerleeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Pharr v. WorleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. In Re DaqCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Brundage v. FoyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Brundage v. FoyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API