Legal Opinion

Vernakes v. City of South Haven

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1915No. Docket No. 130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Van Burén; Des Voignes, J. Thomas Vernakes was convicted in justice’s court of Selling pop corn in the city of South Haven without a hawker’s license and removed the proceedings to the circuit court by writ of certiorari; conviction affirmed, and respondent brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Thomas Vernakes was granted two licenses to do business in the city of South Haven; one for maintaining a stand, and one for a pop corn wagon. For these licenses he paid the city $30. By their terms they expired in June, 1913. On the evening of July 19,. 1912, a special meeting of the council, attended by all of the aldermen, was held and the licenses revoked.

The resolution adopted contained the following as the reason for revoking the licenses:

“Said Thomas Vernakes conducts his business in a noisy and disorderly manner, and persists in continuously and loudly calling’his wares to attract the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Stevenson v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Boehme v. City of MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kenaston v. RikerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People v. KeirMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Burton v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ahrens v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. People v. PoymaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API