In Re Dees
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
The determination of this matter depends on the validity of a recent amendment to the San Francisco License Ordinance and particularly to the section thereof relating to the resale of theater tickets, for the violation of which the petitioner was arrested.
On behalf of the municipality it is maintained that the provisions of the ordinance were adopted by the local legislative body in the exercise of its admitted power to raise, revenue by taxation, and that the courts cannot interfere with the exercise of this power. The petitioner, on the other hand, contends that the provisions in question…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Patton v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Ex parte WhitwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Ex Parte QuargCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Loska v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Morgan v. Jewell Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936
- In Re HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- In Re BockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.