Legal Opinion

People v. Armstrong

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1968No. Crim. 2881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

—Defendant was convicted of the offense of lewd and lascivious conduct upon the body of a child under the age of 14 years, a violation of Penal Code, section 288. Imposition of sentence was suspended and proceedings were commenced iinder the statute providing for the commitment, care and treatment of mentally disordered sex offenders, viz., Welfare and Institutions Code, section 5500 et seq. The proceedings were conducted in three stages, each by a different judge, resulting respectively ih (1) an order dated April 9,; 1964, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code, section 5512, declaring…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. Carl G. Gerchman v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  3. Erlich v. Municipal Court of Beverly Hills Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. County of Madera v. GendronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. People v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. In Re BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API