Maskey v. Lackmann
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, judgment entered accordingly, and the plaintiff appeals.
The complaint attempts to state a cause of action against the defendant to recover the sum of $1,061.50, paid by the plaintiff to Laekmann as sheijiff, under protest, to redeem certain real estate belonging to plaintiff from a sale thereof on an execution issued on a judgment- in favor of A. C. AVhyte against Hilley Rosencrantz, a former owner of the real estate, from whom, by mesne conveyances, the plaintiff obtained his-title. The contentions of the plaintiff are that the sheriff’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Pixley v. HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lick v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Fulton v. HanlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Dickinson v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Birch Ranch & Oil Co. v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941