Legal Opinion

Maskey v. Lackmann

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1905No. S.F. No. 3377PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, judgment entered accordingly, and the plaintiff appeals.

The complaint attempts to state a cause of action against the defendant to recover the sum of $1,061.50, paid by the plaintiff to Laekmann as sheijiff, under protest, to redeem certain real estate belonging to plaintiff from a sale thereof on an execution issued on a judgment- in favor of A. C. AVhyte against Hilley Rosencrantz, a former owner of the real estate, from whom, by mesne conveyances, the plaintiff obtained his-title. The contentions of the plaintiff are that the sheriff’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Pixley v. HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lick v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Fulton v. HanlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Dickinson v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Birch Ranch & Oil Co. v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API