Legal Opinion

Ogden v. Riverview Holding Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.

The defendant Riverview Holding Corporation moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint alleges the leasing for a period of two years of an apartment by the plaintiff from the defendant under a written lease. It is also alleged that the plaintiff entered into an agreement in writing to sublet the apartment to a subtenant who has numerous apartments in the defendant's building and that the plaintiff was required under the lease between him and the defendant to secure the consent of the defendant or its agent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sarner v. KantorNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Boskowitz v. CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Robinson v. WhitakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Loesch v. Manhattan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Loesch v. Manhattan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Penthouse Properties, Inc. v. 1158 Fifth Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. American Book Co. v. Yeshiva University Development Foundation, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Friedman v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Ogden v. Riverview Holding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Eastway Plaza, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API