Seebold v. Prison Health Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
In this appeal, we consider whether a physician who treats prison inmates has a duty at common law to warn specific corrections officers that a particular inmate has a communicable disease.
*1234I. Background
Appellee Michelle Seebold filed suit against Appellant Prison Health Services, Inc. (“PHS”), advancing a single cause of action expressly grounded on negligence theory. According to the complaint, in January 2005 PHS was providing medical services at the State Correctional Institution at Muncy pursuant to a contract with the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (“DOC”).…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Dittman, B., Aplt. v. UPMCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Newell v. Montana West, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Charlie, A. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.