Legal Opinion

Seebold v. Prison Health Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2012PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

In this appeal, we consider whether a physician who treats prison inmates has a duty at common law to warn specific corrections officers that a particular inmate has a communicable disease.

*1234I. Background

Appellee Michelle Seebold filed suit against Appellant Prison Health Services, Inc. (“PHS”), advancing a single cause of action expressly grounded on negligence theory. According to the complaint, in January 2005 PHS was providing medical services at the State Correctional Institution at Muncy pursuant to a contract with the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (“DOC”).…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Dittman, B., Aplt. v. UPMCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Newell v. Montana West, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Charlie, A. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API