Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Saul
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 12, 1990No. 90 C 2633PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROVNER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charges in this action that defendant B. Francis Saul, III (“Saul III”) disclosed non-public information about a publicly-traded stock which he obtained from his father, B. Francis Saul, II (“Saul II”), to defendant Peter David Garvy (“Garvy”) and that Garvy and others traded in this stock to their substantial profit on the basis of this information. In its four-count complaint, the SEC characterizes the alleged conduct of Saul III and Garvy as contrary to §§ 10(b) and 14(e) of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- R. Anthony Marrese and Michael R. Treister v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Df Activities Corporation, a Michigan Corporation v. Dorothea F. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Softpoint, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. ESPUELASDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- United States v. FurlettDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Securities and Exch v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.