Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Softpoint, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 20, 1997No. 95 Civ. 2951(SS)PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”), alleges, inter alia, that defendant Ronald G. Stoeeklein (“Stoeeklein”) participated in the sale of unregistered common stock of Softpoint, Inc. (“Softpoint”), thereby violating the securities registration provisions of Sections 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a) and 77e(e). Plaintiff further claims that Stoeeklein deceived public investors as to the true financial status of Softpoint in violation of the anti-fraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- SEC v. PhanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WolfsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In Re Kidder Peabody Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.