Legal Opinion

Farber v. Howell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1983No. 13939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice Pro Tern.

In August 1978, the defendants owed plaintiffs $9,925.54 on a promissory note secured by a deed of trust. The plaintiffs instituted a deed of trust sale and purchased the secured property for $1,000.00. On September 27, 1979, plaintiffs filed an action for deficiency plus costs and accrued interest minus the fair market value at the time of the sale. The complaint prayed for the amount of $9,925.54. An answer was submitted by defendants’ former attorneys on October 19, 1979. In the answer, defendants denied that they owed any deficiency to plaintiffs. Shortly after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Sherwood & Roberts, Inc. v. RiplingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Omega Alpha House Corp. v. Molander AssociatesIdaho Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Meyers v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Straub v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Knight Ins., Inc. v. KnightIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Snake River Equipment Co. v. ChristensenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Southern Idaho Production Credit Ass'n v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API