Legal Opinion
Snake River Equipment Co. v. Christensen
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 1984No. 14275PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Suit was instituted by Snake River Equipment Company (SRE) to collect from Marion and Elaine Christensen certain debts arising out of three conditional sales contracts, a note and an open account, and also to foreclose the personal and real property liens created to secure those debts. The Christensens filed counterclaims against SRE and a third-party complaint against Huron Manufacturing Corporation, the manufacturer of an Easi-pour curb and gutter machine the Christensens had purchased through SRE. In their pleadings the Christensens alleged breach of warranty by both…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Lake Shore Land Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Petricevich v. Salmon River Canal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- W. R. Grimshaw Company and National Surety Corporation v. Nevil C. Withrow Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Glenn Dick Equipment Co. v. Galey Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Jones v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Corbridge v. Clark Equipment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Sammis v. Magnetek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Cox v. Lewiston Grain Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Earl v. Cryovac, a Division of W.R. Grace Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- First Bank of South Dakota v. Haberer Dairy & Farm Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.