Keough v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., overruling a demurrer to the amended complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Appeal from an order overruling a general demurrer to an amended complaint, which contains many allegations purposely inserted that the views of this court might be obtained upon the principal question of law, without first trying the questions of fact.
From these allegations it appears that, prior to any of the proceedings now before us, a public street had existed in the city of St. Paul known as “East Third,” running from Earl street easterly to White Bear avenue, 1^ miles. From this avenue to the city lim*115its easterly was 1 mile, and the intervening land was owned by one Hennessy. In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Shannon v. Judges of District Court of Eleventh Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Moritz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State ex rel. Lawton v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Fitzhugh v. Duluth CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Sang v. Duluth CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Clark v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Tulsa Rig Reel & Mfg. Co. v. HansellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Mason v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Werninger v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916