Tulsa Rig Reel & Mfg. Co. v. Hansell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by the Tulsa Rig- Reel & Manufacturing Company against John Hansel and others. Judgment for defendants upon a directed verdict, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
The plaintiff in error sues here to recover upon a contractor’s bond executed by Hansel and Rouch as contractors with their codefendants as sureties, for material sold, delivered by it to them, and used by the contractors in the building of a school in the city of Sapulpa. This bond is in the usual and statutory form ■as provided by section 3881, Revised Laws 1910, except it is made payable to the board of education of said city instead of to the state of Oklahoma. There is no dispute as to the correctness of the claim due the plaintiff in error; for it is admitted that…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Moore v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Miners' Ditch Co. v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Brownell v. . Town of GreenwichNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Town of Mill Valley v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- D'Yarmett v. School Dist. No. 27, Canadian CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Carl v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925