Legal Opinion
McNeal-Edwards Co. v. Frank L. Young Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 1, 1930No. 2345PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBingham, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The questions raised by the first three assignments of error are whether the District Court acquired jurisdiction either by the service of process upon Mr. French, the attorney of record of the McNeal-Edwards Company, in the suit brought by it against the Young Company, or by the supplementary attachment, or by the defendant, the McNeal-Edwards Company, having in this suit voluntarily submitted itself to the jurisdiction of the court.
It is not, and could not well be, contended that the defendant voluntarily submitted itself to the jurisdiction of the court.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roark v. American Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Hedrick v. Canadian Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1939
- Hisel v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
- McNeal-Edwards Co. v. Frank L. Young Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- Hamilton Bank, N.A. v. Kookmin BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.