Legal Opinion
Hisel v. Chrysler Corporation
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided May 3, 1950No. 6288PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGE, District Judge.
In this action, originally instituted in a court of the State of Missouri, and removed to this Court, writ of attachment was issued against defendant Chrysler Corporation and service on said defendant obtained by summons of garnishee as provided under Sections 1455-1460, R.S.Mo.1939, Mo. R.S.A. After removal, defendant Chrysler Corporation, appearing specially, has moved to dissolve such attachment and quash the writs and service issued and made in aid thereof, on the ground that it was not subject to such process under the laws of the State of Missouri on the cause of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Ex Parte Railway CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- State Ex Rel. Auchincloss, Parker & Redpath, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Earl R. Baxter, Willeyne Baxter, Lynn O. Muse, Richard L. King and W. K. Cash v. United Forest Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Canaday v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- Chase Manhattan Bank (Nat. Ass'n) v. Banque Intra, SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Rockwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Coy Burnett & Mel Dar Corp. v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.