Parker v. Tharp
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant Roxana Marlene Parker was assaulted by a coworker at the workplace during working hours. In her action for assault, she named her employer, respondent Honeywell, Inc., as a defendant under the theory of vicarious liability. Finding that Parker’s exclusive remedy against Honeywell was under the worker’s compensation laws, the trial court granted summary judgment for Honeywell. We affirm.
FACTS
On April 9, 1985, two employees of Honeywell, Inc., Roxana Marlene Parker and Roy Michael Tharp, had a disagreement on Honeywell’s premises during business hours. Their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Lunderberg v. BiermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Petro v. Martin Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. Ramsey CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Radcliffe v. Securian Financial Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Wicken v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Fernandez v. Ramsey CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Gunderson v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.