Legal Opinion

Barkworth v. Palmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jackson; Peck, J. Creditors’ bill by Thomas E. Barkworth and Charles A. Blair, copartners, against William H. Palmer and Mary M. Palmer. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Complainants recovered a judgment against defendant William H. Palmer on March 30, 1895, for $226.10, and $20.50 costs. This proceeding is a judgment creditors’ bill to set aside certain deeds of conveyance made by Palmer to his wife, Mary M. Palmer. The case was heard in open court, and a decree made in favor of complainants, from which defendants appeal. The court filed a written opinion in the case, which sets out the facts upon which that court acted, as follows:

“ For several years prior to July 22, 1893, the defendant William H. Palmer had contested in the courts the proposed will of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cole v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Wooden v. WoodenMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Campbell v. RemalyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Michigan Trust Co. v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovell v. DenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Smead v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Lovell v. DenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API