Legal Opinion
Delaney v. Shobe
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 12, 1964PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
The plaintiff has tendered for in forma pauperis filing his pro. per. “Complaint for Damages for Deprivation of Rights, Privileges and Immunity Secured by the Constitution of the United States.”
Plaintiff’s affidavit of indigency asserts he is without “property, money or means * * * to * * * pay customary * * * fees and costs,” but it would appear that he has little faith in his cause, as he fails to aver his “belief that he is entitled to redress,” as commanded by § 1915, Title 28 U.S.C.A. The complaint fails to substantially comply with local Rules of Court as to form,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1962
- James Francis v. Arthur T. LymanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bennett v. GravelleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
- Westberry v. FisherDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1980
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Roberts v. PepersackDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
- Ambrek v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.