J. A. H. Barkeij v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
For clarity, the parties herein will be referred to as “plaintiff” and “defendant.”
Plaintiff Barkeij has appealed in pro-pria persona from a judgment of the District Court entered June 29, 1954, dismissing his complaint with prejudice. On July 15, 1954, plaintiff filed in the Court below his Motion for Rehearing and New Trial. Subsequently, and during the pen- dency of said motion, two notices of appeal were filed from the judgment, one by plaintiff as attorney pro se on July 22, 1954, and the other by his then attorneys on July 27, 1954. On August 23rd plaintiff…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Higgins v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Clough v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Smith v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Weinbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Murray W. Miller, Cross-Appellee v. Transamerican Press, Inc., Cross-Appellants, and Sam Steiger, Deponent, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Allum v. State of MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Allum v. State of MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.