Legal Opinion
State of Ohio v. United Transp., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 28, 1981No. C-2-78-924PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, State of Ohio, instituted this antitrust action against the defendants claiming that they have violated federal and state antitrust laws by monopolizing and restraining competition in the Columbus, Ohio market for taxicab services. The defendants, United Transportation, Inc., its affiliated taxicab companies and its owners have filed motions under Rule 12(b)(1), (b)(6), and (b)(7), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, seeking dismissal of the action. Also pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion under 12(b)(6), F.R.C.P., to strike…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Ohio Attorney General v. Suwinski (In re Suwinski)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on Its Own Behalf and as Parens Patriae v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc., Carecraft Industries, Ltd., Frederick R. Weisman, and Al Sweet Motor Sales, Inc., Allegheny Toyota, Inc., Bel Air Motors, Inc., Bergman Toyota, Inc., Bob Mayberry Chevrolet-Toyota, Inc., Bud Haas Toyota Motors, Inc., Falconi Toyota Motors, Inc., Joel Confer Amc, Inc., Knobloch Toyota Park, Inc., McCracklin Toyota, Inc., Meadville Toyota, Inc., Montgomery Toyota, Inc., Rohrich Cadillac, Inc., Suburban Toyota, Inc., Trostle Oldsmobile, Inc., University Toyota, Inc., Belvin J. Kishbaugh, Inc., Bobart, Inc., Continental Motor Sales Co., Inc., Hartman Motorcars Co., J.H. Bennett, Inc., James W. Halterman, Inc., Lancaster Toyota, Inc., Performance Motors, Inc., R.D. Ertley Toyota, Inc., Richard Auto Sales, Inc., Valley Toyota, Inc., A.S. Berman, Inc., Airport Toyota, Inc., Central City Toyota, Inc., Charles A. Bott, Inc., Chester Mack Toyota, Inc., Foster Toyota, Inc., Henry Kehl Enterprises, Inc., Peter Alan Toyota, Inc., Sloane Toyota, Inc., Speedcraft Enterprises, Inc., Thompson Toyota, Inc., Tony Biscotte, Inc., District of Columbia Ex Rel. Rogers v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc., Carecraft Industries, Ltd., Frederick R. Weisman, and Rosenthal Toyota, Inc., Silver Spring Toyota, Inc., Maryland Ex Rel. Sachs, Delaware Ex Rel. Gebelein v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc., Carecraft Industries, Ltd., Frederick R. Weisman, Anton Motors, Inc., Schaefer/may Motors Sales, Ltd., Torrey, Inc., Castle Toyota, Inc., Croyste Toyota, Inc., Waldorf Toyota, Inc., Younger Toyota, Inc., Annapolis-Toyota, Inc., Rosenthal Toyota, Inc., Silver Spring Toyota, Inc., Fulker Toyota, Inc., Jones Plymouth, Inc., Fredericktown Toyota, Inc., Toyota Village, Inc., R & H Motor Cars, Ltd., Russell Motor Cars, Inc., Schaefer & Strohminger, Inc., Best Toyota, Inc., Laurel Toyota, Inc., Premier Motor Co., Inc., Timonium Toyota, Inc., Royal Imports of Delaware, Inc., Airport Toyota, Inc., C.F. Schwartz Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983