Legal Opinion
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 24, 1983No. Nos. 82-1131 to 82-1133PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:
This interlocutory appeal has been certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), on the question whether the state attorneys general of Maryland, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, and the Corporation Counsel of the District of Columbia, may maintain statutory parens patriae damage actions under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15c-15h (1976) (the Act), in the names of their respective jurisdictions on behalf of their natural-person residents injured by an alleged price-fixing conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Act, 15…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sachs v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Milk Industry Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on Its Own Behalf and as Parens Patriae v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc., Carecraft Industries, Ltd., Frederick R. Weisman, and Al Sweet Motor Sales, Inc., Allegheny Toyota, Inc., Bel Air Motors, Inc., Bergman Toyota, Inc., Bob Mayberry Chevrolet-Toyota, Inc., Bud Haas Toyota Motors, Inc., Falconi Toyota Motors, Inc., Joel Confer Amc, Inc., Knobloch Toyota Park, Inc., McCracklin Toyota, Inc., Meadville Toyota, Inc., Montgomery Toyota, Inc., Rohrich Cadillac, Inc., Suburban Toyota, Inc., Trostle Oldsmobile, Inc., University Toyota, Inc., Belvin J. Kishbaugh, Inc., Bobart, Inc., Continental Motor Sales Co., Inc., Hartman Motorcars Co., J.H. Bennett, Inc., James W. Halterman, Inc., Lancaster Toyota, Inc., Performance Motors, Inc., R.D. Ertley Toyota, Inc., Richard Auto Sales, Inc., Valley Toyota, Inc., A.S. Berman, Inc., Airport Toyota, Inc., Central City Toyota, Inc., Charles A. Bott, Inc., Chester Mack Toyota, Inc., Foster Toyota, Inc., Henry Kehl Enterprises, Inc., Peter Alan Toyota, Inc., Sloane Toyota, Inc., Speedcraft Enterprises, Inc., Thompson Toyota, Inc., Tony Biscotte, Inc., District of Columbia Ex Rel. Rogers v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc., Carecraft Industries, Ltd., Frederick R. Weisman, and Rosenthal Toyota, Inc., Silver Spring Toyota, Inc., Maryland Ex Rel. Sachs, Delaware Ex Rel. Gebelein v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc., Carecraft Industries, Ltd., Frederick R. Weisman, Anton Motors, Inc., Schaefer/may Motors Sales, Ltd., Torrey, Inc., Castle Toyota, Inc., Croyste Toyota, Inc., Waldorf Toyota, Inc., Younger Toyota, Inc., Annapolis-Toyota, Inc., Rosenthal Toyota, Inc., Silver Spring Toyota, Inc., Fulker Toyota, Inc., Jones Plymouth, Inc., Fredericktown Toyota, Inc., Toyota Village, Inc., R & H Motor Cars, Ltd., Russell Motor Cars, Inc., Schaefer & Strohminger, Inc., Best Toyota, Inc., Laurel Toyota, Inc., Premier Motor Co., Inc., Timonium Toyota, Inc., Royal Imports of Delaware, Inc., Airport Toyota, Inc., C.F. Schwartz Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Cranfill v. Scott & Fetzer Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1990