Ohio Attorney General v. Suwinski (In re Suwinski)

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT TO DETERMINE DISCHARGEABILITY OF CERTAIN DEBTS

(Related to Doc. 22)

C. KATHRYN PRESTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

This cause came on for consideration of Defendant Casimir S. Suwinski, Jr.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) (Doc. 22) the Complaint to Determine Dis-chargeability of Certain Debts (“Complaint”) (Doc. 1) filed by Ohio Attorney General, Michael DeWine (“Plaintiff’). Pending before the Court are the Motion, Plaintiffs response and Defendant’s reply. The Motion, response and reply raise the issue of…