Legal Opinion

People v. Clinton

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1924No. Docket No. 1199PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.

Defendants were jointly informed against for the crime of burglary. They were jointly tried and convicted of burglary of the first degree. Appeal is taken from the judgment of conviction.

The information charged that the defendants “willfully and unlawfully did enter the store and room of Forsythe & Simpson in Burlingame, California, with the felonious intent then and there to commit the crime of larceny, all of which was then and there done by said defendants in the nighttime, contrary,” etc.

The main point of the defendants is that the judgment and verdict are void because defendants were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. MorelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. WarwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API